We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are the Different Types of Affirmative Defenses?

Jessica Ellis
By
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

An affirmative defense is a claim by a defendant in a trial that, while the accusations of action may be true and proven, the reasons behind them negate or partially negate the crime. Affirmative defenses contrast with negative defenses, which assert that a crucial part of the accusation is incorrect. There are many different types of affirmative defenses, including self-defense, insanity, accord and satisfaction, duress, and contributory negligence.

Though most laws provide absolutes, most legal systems make allowances for the fact that technically criminal actions may not be actually criminal in some circumstances. Self-defense affirmative defenses argue that while the defendant broke the law, it was with the reasonable and honest belief that his or her life was at stake. For example, a woman who shoots and kills her husband after he pulls out a weapon and tells her he is going to kill her and her children might be able to enter a plea of self-defense. Like most affirmative defenses, self-defense claims argue that the reasons behind the actions justify or excuse the behavior that might otherwise be considered criminal.

Some affirmative defenses, such as pleas of insanity, argue that the accused defendant is incapable of knowing or understanding the law, and thus cannot be fairly held to its requirements. Insanity defenses may not fully excuse a crime; clearly, if a person is proven insane enough to commit a criminal action, he or she may be seen as a danger to society. This type of defense is often used to lower or alter the penalties for a crime, such as removing special circumstance charges that could lead to the death penalty, or to allow a judge to send the defendant to a mental health institution instead of jail.

Affirmative defenses are frequently used in civil as well as criminal law. There are many different affirmative defenses that may be appropriate for civil cases, including accord and satisfaction, and contributory negligence. Accord and satisfaction occurs when a defendant discharges a contracted debt by agreeing to pay his lender a mutually acceptable amount, even if it is less than the originally specified amount. For instance, if a homeowner loses his job before he can pay a landscape architect for a $7,000 US Dollar (USD) job, the two might work out a new contract that allows the homeowner to discharge the debt with a one time payment of $4,500 USD. If, after receiving this payment, the landscape architect then decided to sue the homeowner for breaching the original contract, the homeowner might respond with a claim of accord and satisfaction.

Contributory negligence occurs when a defendant proves that a plaintiff was partially responsible for his own predicament. If a family sues a school district because their child slipped and fell on a newly-mopped floor, the school might be able to claim contributory negligence if it can be shown that the child was running through the halls and ignored “wet floor” signs. Contributory negligence may serve to lessen the amount of a claim or charge, or may be enough to have a case dismissed altogether.

Though affirmative defenses can be very successful, they often turn a case around by placing the burden of proof on the defendants. Normally, it is the job of the plaintiff to prove the guilt or responsibility of the defendant in a case. By claiming that the reasons behind the action excuse the crime, the defendant must then give compelling evidence that supports his or her claim in order to avoid conviction or damages.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Jessica Ellis
By Jessica Ellis
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis brings a unique perspective to her work as a writer for MyLawQuestions. While passionate about drama and film, Jessica enjoys learning and writing about a wide range of topics, creating content that is both informative and engaging for readers.
Discussion Comments
Jessica Ellis
Jessica Ellis
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis...
Learn more
MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.