We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Condition Subsequent?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A condition subsequent is a situation that terminates a previously valid contract. Closely related legal concepts are conditions precedent and conditions concurrent. Certain types of contracts have clauses built in providing information about what happens when or if a condition subsequent arises. Essentially, it is a condition in a contract that triggers termination of the agreement and eliminates rights, responsibilities, and obligations for both parties.

Conditions subsequent may take the form of events that occur while both parties are bound to the contract. These conditions can also involve the failure of events to occur, or the cessation of an ongoing occurrence. One example of a condition subsequent might be a divorce. In a prenuptial agreement, there may be a clause stating that in the event of a divorce, interest in any real property reverts to the original owner.

When a condition subsequent occurs, it terminates any duty to perform and can also terminate rights and interests that were present under the terms of the contract. It is important to read contracts carefully to identify any situations that might be conditions subsequent and to determine what happens if these situations arise. Since contract law can be extremely complicated and at times difficult to understand, having a lawyer review a proposed contract may be beneficial for certain types of agreements.

Certain types of contracts have conditions subsequent built into them as a general rule and such conditions may be spelled out in boilerplate contracts that people can use for generic agreements. In other cases, a condition subsequent is added into a contract to account for special circumstances or situations. Either party to a contract can request to have such conditions added and can also contest these and any other terms of the contract if they are believed to be potentially against someone's interests.

When a contract has a clause that includes a condition subsequent and people suspect that this hypothetical circumstance is going to become a reality, it may be advisable to ask an attorney for help before the circumstances arise. The attorney can help people negotiate the termination of the contract as smoothly as possible in the given circumstances and can provide advice and assistance to limit liability and protect interests. Specialists in contract law can often provide the most sound advice to people in this situation, as they are intimately familiar with how contracts work and with how contracts can be litigated.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a MyLawQuestions researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By David09 — On Jul 09, 2011

@MrMoody - I do believe that term is often used in that manner. As for letting both parties off the hook, it would depend on the nature of the contract.

A guy I work with had his house burned down several months ago. It was the result of some guy lighting a cigarette and tossing it on the dry lawn on an extremely hot summer day.

The next thing you know, an inferno was blazing through the neighborhood and parts of it reached my friend’s house and basically turned it into ashes. It was too late to rescue it by the time the fire trucks came.

The point is that the insurance company covered the repairs (or new house), because of course that’s what they’re supposed to do. So I don’t think they’d be off the hook in that case.

But I do agree that in most contracts, an act of God makes it null and void.

By MrMoody — On Jul 08, 2011

I wonder if what is commonly called an “act of God’ would come under the legal definition of a condition subsequent?

I think it would actually, and you see this phrase used a lot in certain contracts. Basically, if some terrible weather event or something unexpected happens, the contract becomes null and void.

While I somewhat object to the term act of God to refer to these events, I think it’s fair to insist that these would be extenuating circumstances that would more or less let both parties off the hook.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.