We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What Is a War of Aggression?

Leigia Rosales
Updated: May 16, 2024

For as far back as we have recorded history, wars have been waged in order for territorial gain or in order to conquer another nation. The concept that the stronger nation should prevail was largely accepted throughout the world until the 20th century, when the concept of aggression without justification began to lose favor. A new term — "war of aggression" — began to make its way into the nomenclature of many languages as a way to describe a war that serves no justifiable purpose, such as self-defense. Since then, the world view on aggression has changed to the point that crimes of aggression are now considered international crimes right along with human trafficking and genocide.

When one nation, or a faction thereof, engages in armed conflict against another nation without provocation, it is said to have waged a war of aggression. In modern times, a war of aggression is considered unacceptable among most nations of the world. Although the precise definition of a war of aggression may be disputed, most scholars agree that a war without the justification of self-defense fits the definition.

In most cases, a war of aggression is waged in order to gain territory or to subjugate the people of another nation. The war waged by the Nazis in Germany during the 1940s is generally considered to be a prime example of a war of aggression. A more recent example is the infiltration of Kuwait by Iraq in 1990, which ultimately led to the Gulf War.

The lack of a uniform definition for a crime of aggression or a war of aggression has been the main obstacle in prosecuting crimes of aggression on an international level. Although an International Criminal Court exists, its jurisdiction is limited and complicated. The Rome Statute of the Criminal Court, which is the international treaty establishing the court, does assert that crimes of aggression are punishable by the court; however, a uniformly accepted definition of aggression continues to be an issue among the member nations. In addition, not all nations have signed or ratified the treaty — among the notable absences are the United States, China, and India.

Until a uniform definition for crimes of aggression can be agreed upon, prosecution will remain elusive. Public opinion, however, and international consensus will be a deterrent to nations that may consider waging war on another nation without just cause. The United Nations, as well as numerous international treaties, will continue to serve as the authority on guidance regarding armed conflict until the International Criminal Court, or a similar body, is finally ready to fulfill that role.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Leigia Rosales
By Leigia Rosales
Leigia Rosales is a former attorney turned freelance writer. With a law degree and a background in legal practice, she crafts compelling content that informs and engages readers. Her ability to understand complex topics and communicate them effectively makes her a valuable asset to any content creation team.
Discussion Comments
By Animandel — On May 15, 2014

Recent international humanitarian laws and the penalties a country will face if it starts a war of aggression make the world a safer place for everyone. No longer do countries feel they can conquer smaller nations simply because they want to.

Without these acts, we would be looking at a new age of colonialism, with the most powerful countries fighting for the possession of smaller countries.

By Sporkasia — On May 15, 2014

War of aggression sounds like a bad choice of words. After all, aren't all wars based on aggression. I understand the significance of such a designation, but I think we need a new term. I have heard the words unjustified war used to convey the same meaning.

By mobilian33 — On May 14, 2014

I think the war of aggression terminology has very little significance in stopping a powerful country from declaring war on another country. During WW II when Germany moved across Europe attacking other countries they made no excuses.

Now when a world power wants to attack another country it simple makes up reasons to attack. The actual attack may have to wait while the aggressor country presents its case to the world, but eventually the attack will happen.

The United States' attack on Iraq is a perfect example. The U.S. leaders manipulated surveillance video to justify a war. The information was later discredited, but after the fact.

Leigia Rosales
Leigia Rosales
Leigia Rosales is a former attorney turned freelance writer. With a law degree and a background in legal practice, she...
Learn more
MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.