What is Diplomatic Immunity?
In many crime dramas and action movies, a prime suspect often eludes capture by claiming "diplomatic immunity." The belief is that foreign diplomats, their staff, and immediate family members cannot be arrested for violating local laws, but in reality, this form of immunity is not quite as all-encompassing. Only certain recognized foreign diplomats can actually claim it, and the privilege is generally offered as a quid pro quo for American diplomats stationed overseas. Diplomatic immunity is not an impenetrable shield against the laws of the land, but more of a courtesy extended to diplomats who cannot afford to be held up by minor traffic violations or other misdemeanors.
The rules regarding diplomatic immunity are spelled out clearly in policy manuals published by the respective governments. Historically, some form of immunity has been extended to foreign dignitaries and their official entourages on peacekeeping missions or treaty negotiations. In 1961, an international convention on diplomatic relations was held in Vienna, which helped to unify and codify the practice.
Not every foreign official or staff member of a consulate is entitled to full diplomatic immunity. A recognized foreign diplomat and his or her immediate family enjoys the most protection, although even diplomats can receive traffic tickets. Administrators and technical personnel attached to a foreign diplomat are also protected very well under this practice, but service staff members have no legal protection except when it comes to their performance of official duties.
The situation changes at the consulate level, however. Unlike the diplomatic corps, officers and staff assigned to consulates have very few protections under these rules. Diplomats and consulate officers cannot be compelled to testify in court concerning official acts, but consular officers can be prosecuted or subpoenaed as witnesses.
While the concept of diplomatic immunity might appear ripe for widespread abuse, most diplomats understand and respect the laws of the countries they visit. If a diplomat, or one of his or her family members, ever did commit a serious crime, the host country could declare the offender persona non grata, meaning he or she is no longer welcome in the country. Diplomats may be immune from local law enforcement efforts, but they are still subject to the laws of their countries of origin. Anyone who abuses the privilege of diplomatic immunity can be recalled by their country's government and prosecuted under their system of justice. This may be just enough incentive for diplomats to make every effort to obey the laws of their host countries.
Wow, that is extremely unfair to people's rights. What ever happened to people equality? If people get to bail themselves out easily from a crime just by saying "diplomatic immunity," the world is even more messed up than I thought. Wow. Just wow.
I worked at an embassy and when time came for my vacation (already signed and approved), I was denied it and was told if i went on vacation i would have to leave. So i went on my vacation anyway and showed up for work when my vacation was over.
The diplomat in charge wanted me to sign a letter he typed stating that I resigned for personal reasons (LOL) and basically wanted to pay me off. I asked him for proof that I resigned and he started to behave obnoxious and erratic.
All I wanted was something from him in writing stating I was fired and why, but of course he couldn't provide that cause he had no reason to fire me. Spoke to a lawyer and he mentioned this Diplomatic Immunity thing. It's really unfair that a person from another country could come into your country on your soil and do as they please without any just cause.
To all readers out there, know this: if you ever plan to work at a foreign embassy in your homeland, just be prepared to be stripped of all your rights.
I found most of the diplomats use this authority for their own benefit. It's unfair.
What if a charge d'affaires or an attache terminate an employee without a reason? even they have terminated the worker but still they need their knowledge and service. It's more to politics in the office.
Post your comments