What Is the Conflict Model?
The term "conflict model" describes the workings of a criminal justice system that is based on a competitive approach to bringing about justice. Many criminal justice systems have several different organizations that often overlap in duties and jurisdictions. In the conflict model of criminal justice, the organizations and the people who work for them have more to gain from competing with the other organizations and individuals than they do from cooperating with them. In contrast to this model is the consensus model of criminal justice. In the consensus model, the various parts that make up the criminal justice system work cooperatively to bring about justice.
Some believe that the conflict model of criminal justice is superior to the consensus model because it encourages a competitive approach toward justice. Those organizations and individuals that have the greatest success reducing crime benefit from better funding, advancement opportunities, and a variety of other incentives. This model also often leads to disputes between different organizations or groups of organizations, particularly when legal issues are involved. Some, for instance, cannot take certain law enforcement actions without prior approval from a judge. This form of conflict, though it may slow or disrupt the law-enforcement process, ensures that no particular group within the criminal justice system gets too much power or autonomy.
Others are opposed to the conflict model and believe instead that the consensus model of criminal justice is the best organizational system for promoting justice. Different organizations would be able to work together freely by pooling manpower and other resources and by sharing important information. As opposed to the conflict model, the consensus model does not offer any particular incentive for individuals or groups to try to perform better than others. This model, therefore, requires that individuals and organizations are truly dedicated to the notion of "justice," as there are likely fewer incentives for particularly high performance.
In some cases, the term "conflict model" is used to describe the specific conflict that often exists between crime control and due process in criminal justice. Those who primarily support crime control hold crime reduction as the most important role of a criminal justice system. Many, however, hold due process, or fair treatment under the law, as a criminal justice system's most important role. In many cases, the various legal processes relating to due process inhibit crime control, so conflict exists. Many of the actual organizational conflicts in this model are related to the inherent clash between due process and crime control.
@burcinc-- Why do we want cooperation between agencies?
I'm sure there is some cooperation, but competition is better because people perform better at their jobs when there is competition. Without competition, things would become bureaucratic and people would slack off all the time.
I think the conflict model works just fine. My professor always says that we should aim for the consensus model but I don't agree with this.
@literally-- I think these are just theories about how the criminal justice system could work, so they're not really applied to the system.
I personally don't see much advantage in the conflict model, even though this model is probably much closer to how things work in real life. There is just so little cooperation in the conflict model. But we need cooperation between agencies and departments in order make things run smoothly, efficiently and quickly.
The only advantage of the conflict model might be cost-effectiveness, but that doesn't necessarily mean that things are working well.
So both conflict and consensus systems have their advantages and disadvantages. Which model does the American justice system use now? Or is it a mix of both?
Post your comments