We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Wergild?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Wergild or weregeld was money paid to compensate victims of crimes in Saxon culture. In the case of murder victims, the money was paid to the victim's family or lord. By paying wergild, guilty parties could discharge any obligations related to the crime and the matter would be considered settled. Under Saxon law, the amount of wergild paid varied depending on the victim's social status and the nature of the crime; money was generally paid for murders, serious injuries, and major property theft. The system became quite complicated over time, providing interesting insights into how people and goods were valued in Saxon culture.

When the culprit of a crime was identified, that individual would be offered an opportunity to pay wergild in an amount determined by the code. Crimes committed against high ranking members of society came at a literally higher price, while some members of society were not entitled to wergild at all because of their low social status. In some cases, money was due not only to the victim, but the victim's lord.

If the guilty individual could not pay the money or refused to pay, the family of the victim had the right to retaliate. This right was often an obligation, as people could not allow crimes to go unremarked or unpunished. In many cases, this devolved into a blood feud spanning multiple generations as families took vengeance on each other and awaited vengeance for their actions.

This term, which translates as “man gold,” reflected important concepts and values in Saxon society. The ability to compensate victims as a form of punishment was common in many societies and is still used in some regions of the world today. Documentation involving cases where wergild was paid is used by scholars to learn more about how Saxons valued members of their society along with their belongings. These records also offer interesting information about the types of crimes people committed, and their frequency.

Eventually, this concept was phased out. In cases where people might once have paid compensation, capital punishment because the preferred method of punishment. In many instances, societies adopted the practice of both compensation and capital punishment, as seen in medieval England where people who committed certain crimes could have their property confiscated by the Crown in addition to being sentenced to death. Not incidentally, this allowed the Crown to concentrate power and wealth in addition to providing a strong disincentive for engaging in crimes like treason, where forfeiture of all assets was an automatic punishment. Even if people were willing to face the death penalty, most were reluctant to leave their families destitute.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a MyLawQuestions researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments
By anon318818 — On Feb 09, 2013

That will work for people who can afford to repay what they stole/cost of damages. But a lot of petty crimes are committed by those who are lesser off and probably have not got the money to pay for the crimes and other forms of punishment are therefore used.

And community service is encouraged for 'minor criminals', as long as they are not a huge danger to society they will not be imprisoned. That sort of repays the community for the crimes they have committed.

By anon164103 — On Mar 30, 2011

Why can we not introduce Wergild punishment against minor criminals today? Instead of the public having to keep them in prison, take away their goods, monies, or make them work to earn monies to give, to the value of the damage done, plus 100 percent more for compensation, payable to the victims?

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.