We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Are the Different Types of Biological Evidence?

Leigia Rosales
By
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

When a person is accused of a crime, many different types of evidence may used by law enforcement to find the perpetrator or be introduced by the prosecution at trial in order to convince the judge or jury of the defendant's guilt. Evidence that may be introduced at trial may include documentary, tangible, or biological evidence, among other types. Examples of evidence that may be considered biological evidence include blood, saliva, and hair, as well as skin, semen, and nail clippings.

When a crime is committed, it is extremely rare that no biological evidence is left behind by the perpetrator. People leave trace evidence of their presence everywhere that they visit as a rule. Hair, for instance, routinely falls out in order to make room for more to grow. Skin also naturally exfoliates, or flakes off, in order to make room for the newer skin cells.

Despite efforts by many criminals to prevent leaving any evidence of who they are, the vast majority of the time, some evidence is left behind. This is particularly true in the case of a violent crime. When a struggle takes place, the chances of the perpetrator leaving behind biological evidence increases significantly. This evidence may be found at the crime scene or on the victim himself or herself.

Due to the rapid advances in science during the 20th century, analysis of biological evidence often leads to the identity of a perpetrator. When biological evidence is located at a crime scene or on a victim, it is collected and sent to a laboratory for analysis. Depending on the type of evidence, the analysis may be able to tell law enforcement a variety of things, such as whether the perpetrator is male or female, an approximate age, and what color hair he or she has.

Along with providing clues during the investigation stage of a crime, biological evidence may be used to convict the defendant at trail. For years, blood evidence was used to rule out a defendant if the blood type found was not the same as the defendant's. When the blood types were the same, it was used as evidence by the prosecution, but was rarely considered determinative. Other biological evidence has also historically been used to help determine the identity of a criminal or to rule out a potential suspect.

With the advances in DNA testing, blood evidence can now be used to compare blood found at a crime scene with a potential suspect's blood with an accuracy rate of better than 99%. DNA testing is considered to be so accurate that, along with helping to convict defendants, it has also helped to free many wrongly-convicted people. Within the United States, many people have been released from prison, and their convictions overturned, due to a DNA analysis of blood that was unavailable at the time of conviction, which rules them out as the possible perpetrator of the crime.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Leigia Rosales
By Leigia Rosales , Former Writer
Leigia Rosales is a former attorney turned freelance writer. With a law degree and a background in legal practice, she crafts compelling content that informs and engages readers. Her ability to understand complex topics and communicate them effectively makes her a valuable asset to any content creation team.

Discussion Comments

By anon349545 — On Sep 27, 2013

I have met a girl, but have not had sex with her. We only use kisses and her hand. If a medical exam takes place, what will happen?

Leigia Rosales

Leigia Rosales

Former Writer

Leigia Rosales is a former attorney turned freelance writer. With a law degree and a background in legal practice, she...
Learn more
MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.